Artificial Intelligence and Environmental Sustainability in Action: Student Narratives of Practicing Green Habits Beyond the Classroom
Main Article Content
Abstract
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into students' daily lives has created new opportunities to support environmental learning and promote sustainable behaviors beyond formal educational settings. This study explored how AI influences students' environmental learning and the development of green habits in their everyday lives. Guided by Narrative Inquiry, the study involved sixteen undergraduate students selected through purposive sampling based on their experience using AI applications and practicing environmentally sustainable behaviors. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. The findings revealed that AI functioned as an everyday eco-companion that translated environmental knowledge into practical action through personalized guidance, real-time recommendations, and enhanced ecological awareness. Participants further perceived AI as instrumental in strengthening consistent green habits, fostering personal environmental responsibility, building confidence in sustainable decision-making, encouraging environmentally conscious consumption, and inspiring environmental advocacy within their families and peer groups. Overall, AI was viewed not merely as an information source but as a facilitator that connected environmental learning with everyday practice. The study concludes that AI has significant potential to complement sustainability education by empowering students to integrate environmentally responsible behaviors into their daily routines. These findings contribute to the emerging discourse on artificial intelligence and sustainability education and provide insights for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers seeking to leverage AI in cultivating environmentally responsible citizens..
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Arif, M., Ismail, A., & Irfan, S. (2025). AI-powered approaches for sustainable environmental education in the digital age: A study of Chongqing International Kindergarten. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v7i1.184
Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506292938
Barr, S., & Gilg, A. W. (2006). Sustainable lifestyles: Framing environmental action in and around the home. Geoforum, 37(6), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.01.006
Berezowitz, C. K., Bontrager Yoder, A. B., & Schoeller, D. A. (2015). School gardens enhance academic and dietary outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of School Health, 85(8), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12278
Borja, L. C. A., César, S. F., Cunha, R. D. A., & Kiperstok, A. (2018). A quantitative method for prediction of environmental aspects in construction sites of residential buildings. Sustainability, 10(6), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061870
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00290
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Clayton, S. (2019). The psychology of environmental behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102840
Cotton, D., & Winter, J. (2010). Sustainability literacy in higher education. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.670207
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dreyer, H., Sonnenberg, N., & Van der Merwe, D. (2022). Transcending linearity in understanding green consumer behaviour: A social–cognitive framework for behaviour changes in an emerging economy context. Sustainability, 14(22), 14855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214855
Dungo, C. A. B., Beltran, Z. L. E., Declaro, B. C., Dela-Cruz, J. J., & Viray, R. U. (2025). Students' level of awareness on the environmental implications of generative AI. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 11(2), 93–107.
Evans, T., & Stevenson, R. B. (2017). Global trends in environmental education: A critical review of empirical research. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 180–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866
Fisher Maltese, C., & Zimmerman, T. D. (2015). A garden based approach to teaching life science produces shifts in students’ attitudes toward the environment. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.230a
Fontan, A., Farjadnia, M., Llewellyn, J., Katzeff, C., Molinari, M., Cvetkovic, V., & Johansson, K. H. (2023). Social interactions for a sustainable lifestyle: The design of an experimental case study. https://angelafontan.github.io/papers/conferences/Fontan2023Social.pdf
Fung, C. Y., & Adams, E. A. (2019). What motivates student environmental activists on college campuses? Social Sciences, 6(4), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040134
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Motivational dynamics in reading comprehension. In D. Compton, I. W. Hiebert, & M. Kamil (Eds.), Reading research at work (pp. 47–69). Routledge.
Haigh, M. J. (2006). Promoting environmental education for sustainable development: The value of links between higher education and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(2), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260600717422
Halaweh, M. (2026). ChatGPT capabilities for promoting sustainability in education: A framework for mapping with SDGs. Sustainable Development, 34(3), 3095–3106. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70500
Haque, M. N. (2022). Students' perception of environmental sustainability (ES) exercises at higher education institutions (HEIs) in Bangladesh. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues. https://doi.org/10.1108/FEBE-07-2022-0030
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kaşıkçı, M., Bağcı, Y., Yıldırım, Z., & Nacak, U. A. (2025). Carbon footprint awareness of nursing students: A qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 24, Article 189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03021-z
Khan, S., Mazhar, T., Shahzad, T., Khan, M. A., Ur Rehman, A., Saeed, M. M., et al. (2025). Harnessing AI for sustainable higher education: Ethical considerations, operational efficiency, and future directions. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00809-6
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Lin, Y.-C. (2024). Sustainable consumption and environmental change in Taiwan: Understanding consumer perceptions and narratives of practice. Sustainability, 16(12), 5125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125125
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Liu, S.-C., & Château, P.-A. (2025). Fostering hope and action on climate change among university students: Impact of a futures-oriented teaching module with generative AI integration. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10229-w
Macagno, T., Nguyen-Quoc, A., & Jarvis, S. P. (2022). Nurturing sustainability changemakers through transformative learning using design thinking. Sustainability, 16(3), 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031243
Mazar, A., Tomaino, G., Carmon, Z., & Wood, W. (2021). Habits to save our habitat: Using the psychology of habits to promote sustainability. Behavioral Science & Policy, 7(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946152100700207
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
National Commission for Culture and the Arts. (1979). National ethical guidelines for health and health-related research. (Use instead the most current Philippine National Ethical Guidelines if required by your institution.)
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nyqvist, F., Kallio, E., & Hentinen, M. (2020). The learning environment and supportive supervision promote learning and are based on the relationship between students and supervisors. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 17(1), Article 20200015. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2020-0015
O’Brien, K., Selboe, E., & Hayward, B. M. (2021). Exploring youth activism on climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11(10), 852-857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01163-2
Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). A systematic review of generative AI for teaching and learning practice. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09520
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pérez-Juárez, M. Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J. M. (2023). Digital distractions from the point of view of higher education students. Sustainability, 15(7), 6044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076044
Republic Act No. 10173. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
Roberts, T., Smith, K., & Jones, P. (2024). Structured support and collaborative learning for sustainability education. Journal of Environmental Education, 55(1), 12-25.
Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., et al. (2019). Higher education and sustainability: Transformative pathways. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 9(4), 493-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00561-1
Schultz, P. W., & Kaiser, F. G. (2012). Promoting environmental behavior. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (pp. 556–580). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0026
Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810842193
Takshe, A., Hennawi, M., Jebril, S., Alawi, S., AlZaidan, S., & Okasha, A. (2023). Investigating determinants of pro-environmental behaviors amongst UAE university students through Q-methodology. Discover Sustainability, 4(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00156-4
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802.locale=en
Wang, X., Zainuddin, Z., Leng, C. H., Dong, W., & Li, X. (2025). Evaluating the efficacy of ChatGPT in environmental education: Findings from heuristic and usability assessments. On the Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-11-2024-0079.
.