Enhancing Undergraduate Research Skills: Development and Validation of Scaffolded Research Worksheets in Industrial Technology Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
This action research investigated the development and level of acceptability of research worksheets and templates designed to assist Bachelor of Industrial Technology (BIT) and Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education (BTLEd) students in conducting academic research at Pangasinan State University (PSU) Asingan Campus. A total of 191 students participated during the School Year 2024–2025. The worksheets were evaluated for clarity, organization, relevance, and usability using a Likert-type scale. Descriptive statistics were applied to determine mean scores and interpret levels of acceptability. Results revealed that the developed worksheets were rated “Excellent” (M = 3.65) in structure and clarity, “Good” (M = 3.25) in aiding comprehension of research concepts, and “Excellent” (M = 3.50) in promoting independent learning. Findings affirm the effectiveness of structured research worksheets as scaffolding tools in guiding students through the research process. The study recommends institutional adoption of the worksheets as standardized tools for undergraduate research instruction.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6SpringerLink
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024SpringerLink
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Olsen, M. W., Leary, H., & Kim, N. J. (2017). Computer-based scaffolding in STEM: Meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research.https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999PMC
Kim, C., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. (2017). Effectiveness of computer-based scaffolding in PBL for STEM. Educational Psychology Review.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-4
Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2020). Meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning. IRRODL. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638 IRRODL
Choo, S. S. Y., Toh, Y., & Jamaludin, A. (2014). Hard scaffolds (worksheets) in PBL: Effects and implications. Educational Technology Research & Development.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9342-4
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205 SpringerLink
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Worked examples—Instructional principles. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181 SAGE Journals
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Explanations support learning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00030-5 ScienceDirect
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of SRL in learning and teaching. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_01
Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as metacognitive tools for SRL. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
Greene, J. A., & Land, S. M. (2000). Promoting metacognitive strategies during problem solving. ETR&D.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313400
Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). Rubrics in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600600836
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research.https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Nesbit, J., & Adesope, O. (2006). Learning with concept/knowledge maps: Meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.06.003
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent advances. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(88)90023-7
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten Steps to Complex Learning (overview article). Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1465535
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring worked examples. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Help seeking and metacognition in an ITS. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002101
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sluijsmans, D. (2009). Toward integrated assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Educational Technology Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9113-0
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning principles (review paper). Performance Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20028
Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017638
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2014). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2978
Auchincloss, L. C., et al. (2014). CUREs for biology undergrads. CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-01-0005
Brownell, S. E., & Kloser, M. J. (2015). Toward a conceptual framework for CUREs. CBE—Life Sciences Education.https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0208
Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. (2014). Barriers & solutions for CURE access. CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0045
Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Benefits of undergraduate research. Science Education.https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131
Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Lea, J. (2010). Developing research-based curricula. Higher Education Academy report. (Publisher URL) https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-research-based-curricula
Reavis, R., & Thomas, J. (2019). Curriculum model for developing research skills (psychology majors). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000133
Richardson, J. C., Lin, J., & Newby, T. J. (2022). SRL, feedback & autonomy in online learning. Computers & Education.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104465
Kollar, I., Ufer, S., & Fischer, F. (2023). Structuring collaborative research assignments (pre-service teachers). Teaching and Teacher Education.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103844
Vaughn, K. H., Damsen, M., & Jackson, D. R. (2017). Structured research assignments and student confidence. Teaching Sociology.https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X17713188
Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). Learning design, student behaviour & performance (design analytics supporting scaffolds). Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.028