Does Grammar Still Matter in the Age of Artificial Intelligence? Exploring Generation Z's Attitudes Toward AI-Assisted English Communication
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed English communication by providing intelligent writing assistance and real-time grammar support, influencing how Generation Z constructs and evaluates language. Despite the widespread use of AI-powered applications, limited qualitative studies have explored how AI shapes Generation Z's attitudes toward grammar in English communication. This study explored Generation Z's attitudes toward grammar in AI-assisted English communication. Guided by Communicative Competence Theory, Language Attitude Theory, and Sociolinguistic Variation Theory, the study employed a descriptive qualitative research design. Twenty-five (25) purposively selected Generation Z undergraduate students from selected higher education institutions in the Ilocos Region and Eastern Visayas, Philippines, participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that AI enhances participants' grammar awareness by providing immediate feedback and serving as a reliable support tool during English communication. Participants also demonstrated positive attitudes toward AI, citing increased confidence and improved communication while emphasizing that AI should complement rather than replace grammar learning. Furthermore, the study found that although AI has transformed the way Generation Z applies grammar, participants continue to recognize grammar as an essential communication skill for ensuring clarity, credibility, and effective interaction. The findings suggest that Artificial Intelligence functions as a complementary resource that strengthens, rather than diminishes, grammatical competence in English communication. The study highlights the importance of integrating AI-assisted language technologies into English language education while fostering learners' grammatical competence and responsible AI use..
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adalia, H. G., Chavez, J. V., Hayudini, M. A. A., Kinarang, A. J., Sabbaha, N. A., & Salasain, A. M. (2025). Relevance of grammar among Gen Z college students using social learning perspectives. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(3), 432–450.
Alruthaya, A., Nguyen, T.-T., & Lokuge, S. (2021). The application of digital technology and the learning characteristics of Generation Z in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 6863–6887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10859-5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Childs, C. (2025). Sociosyntax and the weight of the linguistic within variation.
Demir, B. (2021). Generation Z students’ expectations from English language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.1
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12479
Harmaini, F. (2026). Incidental English learning through social media among Generation Z learners. Journal of Digital Language Learning.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2021). Academic discourse and global publishing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 100997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100997
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin Books.
Ivenz, P. (2024). Gen Z students and their perceptions of technology in second language acquisition. Arab World English Journal.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lambert, W. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00578.x
Lee, J. S. (2022). Informal digital communication and grammatical variation among university students. Computers and Composition, 63, 102695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102695
Lutfiana, L., & Permatasari, E. K. (2025). Digital English: An investigation of Gen Z’s online language practices through social media and their implications for English language education. JUPERAN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 847–860.
Minoza, A., et al. (2024). Gen Z’s language identity and contemporary philosophies in the digital era. Journal of Natural Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 13–17.
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Suyitno, I. (2025). Language attitudes of Generation Z in classroom interaction. CoDAS Journal.
Wang, J., Jin, G., & Li, W. (2023). Changing perceptions of language in sociolinguistics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 91. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01574-5.