“Feature Engineering vs Automated Feature Learning: Impact on Model Performance”

Main Article Content

Rohan Mehta

Abstract

Two of the most basic methods in machine learning for finding useful information in unstructured data are feature engineering and automated feature learning. The goal of traditional feature engineering has been to improve model interpretability and performance in structured data contexts by relying on domain experts to manually create and select appropriate features. Automatic feature learning, on the other hand, allows models to build hierarchical representations from raw data directly without explicit human interaction; this process is mostly driven by deep learning approaches. investigation of the relative merits of automated feature learning and feature engineering with respect to the effects on generalizability, scalability, and model performance. While automated methods are great at dealing with large-scale, high-dimensional data like photos, text, and audio, this study investigates how handcrafted features can improve performance in domain-specific or low-data situations. Additionally, the study assesses trade-offs based on development effort, interpretability, and computational complexity. In addition, the article emphasizes hybrid methods that maximize performance by integrating domain expertise with automated learning. It explains how the selection of a feature approach affects the results of a model and provides examples from a variety of fields, including healthcare, finance, and natural language processing.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rohan Mehta. (2026). “Feature Engineering vs Automated Feature Learning: Impact on Model Performance”. CINEFORUM, 66(2), 756–761. Retrieved from https://revistadecineforum.com/index.php/cf/article/view/783
Section
Original Research Articles

References

Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013). Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), 1798–1828. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50

Domingos, P. (2012). A few useful things to know about machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 55(10), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347755

Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied predictive modeling. Springer

Zheng, A., & Casari, A. (2018). Feature engineering for machine learning: Principles and techniques for data scientists. O'Reilly Media

Heaton, J. (2016). An empirical analysis of feature engineering for predictive modeling. Proceedings of the SoutheastCon Conference.

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Chollet, F. (2017). Deep learning with Python. Manning Publications

Ng, A. (2016). Machine learning yearnings. DeepLearning.AI

Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference.

Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable machine learning (2nd ed.). Lulu.com

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1157–1182.

Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y. W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18(7), 1527–1554.

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.