Ethical Considerations in AI and ML: Addressing Bias, Fairness, and Accountability in Algorithmic Decision-Making

Main Article Content

Dr. Michael Turner
Dr. Emily Wong

Abstract

Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have become increasingly important as these technologies are integrated into various aspects of society. the ethical challenges surrounding bias, fairness, and accountability in algorithmic decision-making and proposes strategies for addressing them. Biases inherent in training data and algorithms can perpetuate inequalities and discrimination, leading to unfair treatment of individuals from marginalized groups. Fairness-aware algorithms aim to mitigate these biases and ensure equitable outcomes for all individuals. Additionally, ensuring accountability in AI and ML systems is crucial for transparency and trustworthiness, enabling stakeholders to understand, verify, and challenge algorithmic decisions. various approaches for addressing bias, promoting fairness, and enhancing accountability in AI and ML, including data preprocessing techniques, algorithmic fairness frameworks, and transparency and interpretability methods. By addressing these ethical considerations, AI and ML practitioners can develop responsible and inclusive technologies that benefit society while minimizing harm.

Article Details

How to Cite
Turner, D. M., & Wong, D. E. (2024). Ethical Considerations in AI and ML: Addressing Bias, Fairness, and Accountability in Algorithmic Decision-Making. CINEFORUM, 65(3), 144–147. Retrieved from https://revistadecineforum.com/index.php/cf/article/view/77
Section
Journal Article

References

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.

Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning. Big Data, 5(4), 291-305.

Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56-62.

Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 77-91.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Luetge, C. (2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.

European Commission. (2018). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.

ACM US Public Policy Council. (2018). Statement on algorithmic transparency and accountability. Communications of the ACM, 61(6), 22-24.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1-88.

IEEE. (2017). Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems. Retrieved from https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/.