A Comprehensive Review of Homeopathic Treatment for Chronic Pain

Main Article Content

Vaibhav Jain
Prof. Xitij Kapoor

Abstract

Within the scope of this all-encompassing study, we investigate the effectiveness of homoeopathic therapy for the management of chronic pain disorders. In today's healthcare system, chronic pain is a considerable problem, and it often necessitates the use of long-term treatment solutions. The holistic approach to medicine known as homoeopathy has acquired a lot of interest due to the fact that it has the ability to alleviate the symptoms of chronic pain. his article presents an evaluation of the efficacy of homoeopathic medicines in treating a variety of chronic pain illnesses, including arthritis, fibromyalgia, and neuropathy. The evaluation is carried out by doing a study of the current literature. The ideas that underlie homoeopathic therapy are discussed, including the use of compounds that are very diluted in order to activate the body's systems that are responsible for self-healing. In addition, we address the various mechanisms of action of homoeopathy in the regulation of pain, which include neurobiological routes as well as psychosocial aspects. In addition, we discuss the contentious issues and difficulties that are associated with homoeopathic therapies, such as the argument on the effectiveness of placebos in comparison to the actual therapeutic advantages. By emphasising homeopathy's potential as an adjuvant or alternative treatment in personalised pain care methods, the purpose of this study is to offer physicians and patients with a thorough awareness of the role that homoeopathy plays in the management of chronic pain.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vaibhav Jain, & Prof. Xitij Kapoor. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Homeopathic Treatment for Chronic Pain. CINEFORUM, 64(1), 42–49. Retrieved from https://revistadecineforum.com/index.php/cf/article/view/50
Section
Journal Article

References

Jonas, W. B., & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2017). Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, et al. Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Serial Agitated Dilutions in Experimental Toxicology. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 19(8), 439–450.

Witt, C. M., Lüdtke, R., Baur, R., & Willich, S. N. (2007). Homeopathic medical practice: Long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. BMC Public Health, 7(1), 1–9.

Teixeira, M. Z. (2015). Homeopathy for mental health: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Homeopathy: The Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy, 104(4), 234–241.

Mathie, R. T., Roniger, H., Van Wassenhoven, M., Frye, J., Jacobs, J., Oberbaum, M., ... & Fisher, P. (2014). Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 49.

Fisher, P., & van Haselen, R. (2012). Homeopathy and The Lancet. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012, 1–2.

Stub, T., Musial, F., Kristoffersen, A. A., & Alræk, T. (2017). Adverse effects of homeopathy, what do we know? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 34, 35–46.

Hahn, R. G. (2013). Homeopathy: Meta-analyses of pooled clinical data. Forschende Komplementärmedizin/Research in Complementary Medicine, 20(5), 376–381.9. Lüdtke, R., Rutten, A. L. B., & Rutten, A. L. (2008). The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(12), 1197–1204.

Walach, H., & Jonas, W. B. (2004). Placebo research: the evidence base for homeopathy is under construction. Homeopathy: The Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy, 93(3), 117– 119.

Lüdtke, R., Rutten, A. L. B., & Rutten, A. L. (2008). The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(12), 1197–1204.

Linde, K., & Melchart, D. (1998). Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 4(4), 371–388.