The Impact of International Maritime Transport Disruptions on the Performance of International Commercial Sale Contracts: A Comparative Study

Main Article Content

Marwan Mansoor Naeem

Abstract

This study examines the impact of international maritime transport disruptions on the performance of international commercial sale contracts, particularly in light of the increasing risks affecting the regularity of maritime trade and resulting in delivery delays, inability to perform contractual obligations, extraordinary increases in transportation costs, or substantial changes in the circumstances under which the contract was concluded. The study aims to determine the legal characterization of such disruptions and to examine whether they may constitute force majeure or exceptional circumstances justifying the modification of contractual obligations, renegotiation, or termination, while defining the limits of the parties’ liability for their consequences. The study adopts an analytical and comparative approach by examining the rules governing international sale contracts and maritime transport under relevant international conventions and comparing them with the legal frameworks of Egypt, Iraq, and France, with particular emphasis on force majeure, impossibility of performance, unforeseen circumstances, and contractual hardship. The study concludes that the legal effect of a maritime disruption cannot be determined merely by its occurrence, but depends on its actual impact on contractual performance, its foreseeability and the possibility of avoiding its consequences, as well as the allocation of risks under the contract and applicable law. The comparative analysis also reveals differences in the mechanisms adopted to address such disruptions, highlighting the need for greater contractual clarity and further legal development to achieve a fair balance between the parties to international commercial sale contracts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Naeem , M. M. (2026). The Impact of International Maritime Transport Disruptions on the Performance of International Commercial Sale Contracts: A Comparative Study. CINEFORUM, 66(S5), 1110–1122. https://doi.org/10.66669/cineforum.v66iS5.2063
Section
Original Articles

References

Arabic-Language Sources:

Al-Jawda, A. A. S., & Amin, K. N. (2021). [The time of transfer of risk of loss in international sales: A study under Iraqi law and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna 1980)]. Journal of Legal Sciences, 35(4), 255–280.

Jabr, A. K. (2022). [Termination for non-performance of contractual obligations under Iraqi and Iranian law and the 1980 Vienna Convention]. International Journal on Humanities and Social Sciences, 37, 25–39.

Mahmoud, M. A. (2015). [The nature of force majeure in international contracts for the sale of goods: A study of Egyptian gas export contracts]. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Law, Cairo University, Egypt.

Zaghir, A. K. (2023). [The effect of changed circumstances on international commercial contracts: A comparative theoretical study]. Al-Ma'had Journal, 3, 141–188.

Foreign-Language Sources:

Barreto, G. de A. (2016). Hardship in international commercial contracts: A comparative analysis of the rules in transnational commercial law. Revista da Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo, 111, 693–728.

Bridge, M. G. (2017). The International Sale of Goods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Brunner, C. (2009). Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-performance in International Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.

DiMatteo, L. A. (2015). Contractual excuse under the CISG: Impediment, hardship, and the excuse doctrines. Pace International Law Review, 27(1), 258–305.

Garro, A. M. (2007). Force majeure and CISG Article 79: Competing approaches and some drafting advice. In H. M. Flechtner (Ed.), Drafting Contracts under the CISG (pp. 379–382). Oxford University Press.

Janssen, A., & Wahnschaffe, C. J. (2020). COVID-19 and international sale contracts: Unprecedented grounds for exemption or business as usual? Uniform Law Review, 25(4), 466–495.

Kołacz, M. K., Storms, K., Sys, C., & Verheyen, W. (2024). Economic and legal impacts of delayed containers. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 9(1), Article 31, 1–33.

Naeem, M. M. (2026). The effectiveness of the additional period for performance in international sales contracts in the face of maritime transport disruptions: An applied study on the risks of the Strait of Hormuz. Veredas do Direito, 23(12), e237334.

Schwenzer, I. (2008). Force majeure and hardship in international sales contracts. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 39(4), 709–726.

Sutrisno, A., Priyono, F. X. J., Trihastuti, N., Nelson, D., & Wendra, M. (2026). International sales contracts for force majeure: Analysis of supply chain disruption due to the Red Sea crisis 2023–2024. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 9(2).

International Instruments and Institutional Sources:

International Chamber of Commerce. (2020). Incoterms 2020. ICC.

International Chamber of Commerce. ICC Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses.

International Maritime Organization. Red Sea Area: Maritime Security and International Shipping.

International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. (2016). UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016. Rome: UNIDROIT.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (1980). United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. United Nations.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Digest of Case Law on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. United Nations.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (Rotterdam Rules). United Nations.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. United Nations Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea (Hamburg Rules). United Nations.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). Review of Maritime Transport 2024. United Nations.

National Legislation:

France. Code civil, Article 1195.

France. Code civil, Article 1218.

Iraq. Commercial Law No. 30 of 1984. Iraqi National Investment Commission.

Iraq. Civil Code, provisions concerning contractual obligations, impossibility of performance, and changed circumstances.

Judicial and Arbitral Decisions:

Cour de cassation, Chambre commerciale, 15 March 1982, No. 81-10.938.

Cour de cassation, Chambre commerciale, 16 March 1999, No. 97-11.428.

Macromex S.R.L. v. Globex International Inc., AAA/ICDR, Interim Award, 23 October 2007, Case No. 50181T 0036406, CISG-online No. 1645.

Macromex S.R.L. v. Globex International Inc., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 16 April 2008, Case No. 08 Civ. 114 (SAS), CISG-online No. 1653.

Raw Materials Inc. v. Manfred Forberich GmbH & Co. KG, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 6 July 2004, Case No. 1:03-cv-01154, CISG-online No. 925.

Scafom International BV v. Lorraine Tubes S.A.S., Belgian Supreme Court, 19 June 2009, Case No. C.07.0289.N, CISG-online No. 1963.

Scafom International BV v. Lorraine Tubes S.A.S., Antwerp Court of Appeal, 29 June 2006, Case No. 2005/AR/2372, CISG-online No. 3077