Indian Handicrafts as Living Symbols of Religious Traditions, Folk Culture, and Socio-Economic Identity
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indian handicrafts operate at the intersection of material culture, religious and ritual practice, folk knowledge, regional identity, and livelihoods. This article examines these connections through a qualitative documentary analysis of published scholarship, official Indian government information, UNESCO intangible cultural heritage records, and industry data. Unlike a primary survey, the study does not collect responses from artisans or estimate statistical relationships between individual-level variables. Instead, it triangulates available secondary evidence and organises it into five themes: ritual use, folk-cultural knowledge, cultural identity and memory, socio-economic contribution, and cultural continuity under market change. Official sources report that 32.90 lakh artisans had been mobilised under the Pahchan initiative by 30 December 2024. The Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts reported handicraft exports rising from ₹30,019.24 crore in 2022–23 to ₹32,758.80 crore in 2023–24, an increase of 9.13% in rupee terms. UNESCO’s record of the Thatheras of Jandiala Guru documents craft knowledge transmitted through practice and its use in everyday, wedding, and temple contexts. The documentary synthesis indicates that handicrafts should be understood as living heritage sustained by people, skills, rituals, and community knowledge—not merely as products. At the same time, export growth and artisan registration figures do not establish equitable income, secure employment, or the condition of every craft tradition. The article concludes that cultural safeguarding and economic development should be pursued together through artisan-centred design, fair value distribution, intergenerational skill transmission, responsible digital market access, and community participation in heritage decisions.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-
750X(99)00104-7
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper 296). Institute of Development Studies.
Deshmukh, D., Rajput, C. S., Das, S., & Alam, M. M. (2024). Sustainability and livelihood of small-scale handicraft producers in India: A SWOT analysis of Dhokra artisans. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101160
Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts. (2024). 38th annual report 2023–24.
https://epch.in/sites/default/files/electionofcoa/EPCH_38th_Annual_Report_2023-24_B.pdf
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical approaches. Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Culture, Government of India. (n.d.). Intangible cultural heritage.
https://culture.gov.in/intangible-cultural-heritage
Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (2025). Annual report 2024–2025.
Office of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts), Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (n.d.).
Schemes. https://handicrafts.nic.in/schemes.aspx
Office of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts), Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (n.d.).
Exports. https://handicrafts.nic.in/Export.aspx
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper 72). Institute of Development Studies.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Yale University Press.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press.
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage.
https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
UNESCO. (n.d.-a). Traditional craftsmanship. Intangible Cultural Heritage.
https://ich.unesco.org/en/traditional-craftsmanship-00057
UNESCO. (n.d.-b). India: Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/state/india-IN
UNESCO. (2014). Traditional brass and copper craft of utensil making among the Thatheras of Jandiala Guru, Punjab, India. Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/traditional-brass-and-copper-craft-of-utensil-making-among-the-thatheras-of-jandiala-guru-punjab-india-00845
UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions. https://en.unesco.org/creativity/convention/texts
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Venkatesh, V., et al. (2024). Ideating a framework for sustainable livelihood of handicraft producers at the bottom of the pyramid: A mix-method study from India. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 18(3), 701–723. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2023-0035
World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Traditional cultural expressions.
https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/folklore/
World Bank. (2019). Culture in city reconstruction and recovery. World Bank.
Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2025, January 1). Year end review 2024 of Ministry of Textiles. https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=2089306&lang=2®=3
Ray, N. (2025). Decoding artisans, tradition, and livelihood: Tradition meets modernity in Pingla, West Bengal, India. Journal of Academic Advancement, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.58574/jaa.2025.v4.i2.03
Data and transparency statement
This article is based on secondary documentary sources and published aggregate statistics. No primary human-participant data were collected, and no new statistical analysis of individual-level data was conducted. The export figures and artisan-registration count are reproduced from the cited sources. The article should be updated if newer official figures become available before journal submission