Predictive Modelling of a Sequential Anaerobic–Aerobic Biofilm Reactor for Tannery Wastewater Treatment: A Comparative Study of Regression and Artificial Neural Network Approaches

Main Article Content

Prabhu Palanisamy
Karthikadevi S
Moorthi Neelamegam
Pradeep Kumaragurubaran
Gowtham Subramani
M.G.L. Annaamalai

Abstract

Tannery wastewater is characterized by high chemical oxygen demand (COD), tannins, chromium and sulfide content, and its treatment by a single biological process is often insufficient to meet discharge standards. This study develops predictive regression and artificial neural network (ANN) models for a laboratory-scale sequential anaerobic-aerobic biofilm-based reactor treating tannery wastewater, using experimental data collected under varying hydraulic retention time (HRT), organic loading rate (OLR), aeration rate, influent pH, VSS/TS ratio, and influent/effluent COD and volatile fatty acids (VFA). Port-wise linear regression models were first fitted to describe pH stabilization and the volatile fatty acid to alkalinity (VFA/Alkalinity) ratio across three sampling ports, together with the biogas production response to variations in HRT (10-60 h), OLR (1-7 kg/m3/d), and aeration rate (2-12 L/min). A multilayer feed-forward back-propagation neural network (BPNN), with five inputs (OLR, HRT, aeration rate, pH and VFA/Alkalinity), three hidden neurons, and two outputs (biogas production and percentage COD removal), was subsequently trained on 215 data points and tested on 46 unseen data points. The trained network achieved a training performance index of R = 0.93 and testing performance indices of R = 0.99 for both biogas production and percentage COD removal, with an average prediction error of approximately 5% and an overall model accuracy of 95%. The results indicate that the BPNN model substantially outperforms simple linear regression in capturing the nonlinear dynamics of the sequential anaerobic-aerobic biofilm reactor and can serve as a reliable tool for process monitoring and optimization of tannery wastewater treatment.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Palanisamy, P., S, K., Neelamegam, M., Kumaragurubaran, P., Subramani, G., & Annaamalai, M. (2026). Predictive Modelling of a Sequential Anaerobic–Aerobic Biofilm Reactor for Tannery Wastewater Treatment: A Comparative Study of Regression and Artificial Neural Network Approaches. CINEFORUM, 66(S6), 1134–1146. https://doi.org/10.66669/cineforum.v66iS6.1962
Section
Original Articles

References

Abeling, U., & Seyfried, C. F. (1992). Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of high-strength ammonium wastewater – nitrogen removal via nitrite. Water Science and Technology, 26(5-6), 1007-1015.

Abu Qdais, H., Bani Hani, K., & Shatnawi, N. (2010). Modeling and optimization of biogas production from a waste digester using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(6), 359-363.

Boero, V. J., Eckenfelder, W. W., & Bowers, A. R. (1991). Sequencing batch reactors: an overview. Water Science and Technology, 23(4-6), 529-536.

da Silva, L. L., Souza, D. T., Lucas, E. D., & Costa, R. H. R. (2020). Tannery wastewater treatment using an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor: COD removal, biogas production, and sludge characterization. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(4), 104271.

Fatama, K., Akter, N., Saha, B., Nur-E-Alam, M., & Chakma, S. (2024). Minimization the chemical oxygen demand (COD) content in tannery wastewater using activated carbon from spent tea leaves. Applied Environmental Research, 46(3).

Gomaa, O. M., Esmael, N. N., & El-Gendy, N. S. (2018). An upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for the treatment of tannery wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 78(4), 923-932.

Holubar, P., Zani, L., Hager, M., Fröschl, W., Radak, Z., & Braun, R. (2002). Advanced controlling of anaerobic digestion by means of hierarchical neural networks. Water Research, 36(10), 2582-2588.

Jaroenpoj, S., Yu, Q. J., & Ness, J. (2015). Development of artificial neural network models for biogas production from co-digestion of leachate and pineapple peel. The Global Environmental Engineers, 1(2), 42-47.

Li, M., Jia, X., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Wu, J., & Xue, H. (2022). Quantitative analysis of the research development status and trends of tannery wastewater treatment technology. Catalysts, 12(11), 1317.

Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., Tchobanoglous, G., Stensel, H. D., Tsuchihashi, R., & Burton, F. L. (2014). Wastewater engineering: Treatment and resource recovery (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Parthiban, R., & Parthiban, L. (2012). Back propagation neural network modeling approach in the anaerobic digestion of wastewater treatment. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2(4), 1944-1951.

Prabhu, P., Rajan, M. S., Karthick, A., & Venkatesh, R. (2024). Performance evaluation and chemical oxygen demand removal of tannery wastewater through the aerobic-anaerobic route. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(4), 352.

Rathinavelu, V., Upadhyay, V. V., Kumar, R., Mohanavel, V., Nagarajan, N., Rabadiya, D., Mohammed Soudagar, M. E., Salmen, S. H., & Al Obaid, S. (2025). Influences of anaerobic treatment on chemical oxygen demand removal behavior of tannery wastewater. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

Rittmann, B. E., & McCarty, P. L. (2001). Environmental biotechnology: Principles and applications. McGraw-Hill.

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533-536.

Strik, D. P., Domnanovich, A. M., Zani, L., Braun, R., & Holubar, P. (2005). Prediction of trace compounds in biogas from anaerobic digestion using the MATLAB Neural Network Toolbox. Environmental Modelling & Software, 20(6), 803-810