Beyond Digital Accessibility: a Comparative Study of Sign Language Recognition Technologies, Deaf Identity And Inclusive Pedagogy in India And the United Kingdom

Main Article Content

Aastha Thakur
A. Marisport

Abstract

Digital technologies are increasingly being integrated into educational environments to improve accessibility for persons with disabilities. However, their capacity to support the educational inclusion of deaf learners depends on more than technological availability. It requires recognition of sign languages, respect for Deaf identity, culturally responsive pedagogical practices and institutional commitment to educational equality. Against this background, the present study critically compares sign language recognition technologies and inclusive pedagogical practices for deaf learners in India and the United Kingdom. It examines how technological development, legal frameworks and educational policies shape the relationship between accessibility, linguistic identity and meaningful participation in education. Particular attention is given to Indian Sign Language (ISL) and British Sign Language (BSL), including the extent to which automated recognition systems and technology-assisted teaching accommodate linguistic diversity, contextual meaning and the cultural experiences of Deaf communities. Adopting a comparative socio-legal and interdisciplinary methodology, the study draws on doctrinal legal analysis, relevant policy documents, available statistical evidence and an examination of inclusive educational practices in both jurisdictions. It evaluates the challenges associated with teacher preparedness, access to qualified sign language interpreters, digital infrastructure, accessible learning materials and the integration of sign language into mainstream educational settings. The study also critically examines the limitations of automated sign language recognition, particularly the risks of linguistic misinterpretation, inadequate representation of diverse signing communities and the assumption that technological intervention can replace human communication and professional educational support. Through this analysis, the research investigates whether existing legal and institutional arrangements adequately protect the linguistic rights, cultural identities and educational interests of deaf learners. It argues that digital accessibility must be understood as a matter of substantive equality rather than merely a technical feature of educational delivery. Effective inclusion requires accessible technologies, bilingual-bicultural pedagogical approaches, appropriately trained educators, meaningful participation by Deaf communities and institutional accountability for removing educational barriers. Drawing on the principles of equality, accessibility and participation under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the study proposes a rights-based framework for strengthening sign language education and technology-assisted learning in India and the United Kingdom. It concludes that technological progress can contribute to educational justice only when it respects linguistic diversity, recognises Deaf identity and responds to the lived experiences of deaf learners. By connecting digital innovation with cultural recognition and inclusive pedagogy, the study seeks to advance a more equitable understanding of disability inclusion in contemporary education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thakur, A., & Marisport, A. (2026). Beyond Digital Accessibility: a Comparative Study of Sign Language Recognition Technologies, Deaf Identity And Inclusive Pedagogy in India And the United Kingdom. CINEFORUM, 66(S6), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.66669/cineforum.v66iS6.1953
Section
Original Articles

References

UK Council on Deafness, BSL Interpreters and Regional Shortages, UKCOD Policy Brief (2023).

Kusters et al. (2022), p. 249.

United Nations, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, G.A. Res. 61/106, U.N. Doc. A/RES/61/106 (Dec. 13, 2006).

Gulyani (2020), p. 277.

Vick (2004), p. 163.

MoE & IT, Government of India, Digital India Programme Annual Report 2023.

UK Department for Education, Realising the Potential of Technology in Education, EdTech Strategy (2022).

Seale (2023), p. 387.

Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., & Bahan, B., A Journey into the Deaf-World, 2d ed., DawnSign Press (2020)

MoLJ, Government of India, Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, No. 49 of 2016.

British Sign Language Act 2022, c. 26, United Kingdom.

India Const. art. 29, cl. 1.

India Const. art. 21A.

Equality Act 2010, c. 15, United Kingdom.

British Sign Language Act 2022, c. 26, United Kingdom.

MoE, Government of India, UDISE+ Flash Statistics 2022.

National Deaf Children’s Society, Deaf Children’s Education Report (2023).

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, art. 24, Dec. 13, 2006, 2515 U.N.T.S. 3.

Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of India, CRPD/C/IND/CO/1 (2019).

Indian Sign Language Research and Training Centre, Annual Report 2022-23, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment

UK Department for Education, BSL in the Curriculum Update (2024).

Avinash Mehrotra v. Union of India, (2009) 6 SCC 398 (India).

Disabled Rights Group v. Union of India, W.P.(C) 11234/2015 (Del HC).

Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India, (2017) 14 SCC 406 (India).

Camden LBC v. R (JL), [2009] EWHC 781.

R v. Warwickshire County Council, [2010] EWHC 709.

EHRC v. Secretary of State for Education, [2021] EWHC 2683.

British Deaf Association, #BSLActNow Campaign Summary Report (2022).

National Association of the Deaf, India, Policy Advocacy Briefs on ISL Inclusion (2023).

UNESCO GEM Report, Inclusion and Education: All Means All, Global Education Monitoring Report (2020).

Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds, Deaf Education Policy Analysis UK (2023).

L, Harlan, Hoffmeister, Robert, & Bahan, Ben, A Journey into the Deaf-World (2d ed. DawnSign Press 2020)

Shaeffer (2019), p. 181.

Mazumdar (2024), p. 14.

Marschark, M., & Hauser, P. C., How Deaf Children Learn: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know, Oxford University Press (2012).

NIEPD, Annual Survey of Inclusive Education for the Hearing Impaired in India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (2022).

Department for Education, UK, Special Educational Needs in England: January 2023, National Statistics (2023).

Reagan (2020), p. 1479.

Sharma (2009), p. 319.

RCI, Status Report on Disability Education Workforce, GoI (2021).

Singal (2006), p. 239.

BATOD, Interpreter Availability in UK Deaf Education, Policy Briefing (2022).

Karliner (2007), p. 727.

Bajaj Institute of Learning, Internal Academic Evaluation Report, 2021.

Misra (2022), p. 65.

Frank Barnes School for Deaf Children, Ofsted Inspection Report (2023).

National Deaf Children’s Society, Bilingual Deaf Education in the UK (2022).

National Deaf Children’s Society, Case-Based Research Compendium (2023).

Indian Sign Language Research and Training Centre, Pilot Projects Annual Summary (2022).

ASER Centre, Annual Status of Education Report 2021, New Delhi (2022).

National Deaf Children’s Society, Annual Achievement Summary, London (2023).

World Federation of the Deaf, Global Report on Deaf Education and Linguistic Rights (2023).

Johansson (2014), p.1219.

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, art. 24, Dec. 13, 2006, 2515 U.N.T.S. 3.

ICSSR, Perceptions and Challenges of Parents of Children with Disabilities in India, Research Report (2023).

Pansera (2018), p. 23.

UDISE+, School Education in India: Flash Statistics 2022–23, Ministry of Education, Government of India (2023).

Kafczyk (2024), p. 206.

National Disability Network, State of Inclusive Education in India: Stakeholder Review, Disability Rights India Consortium (2021).

MoE, Status of Students with Disabilities in Indian Schools, Annual Report (2023).

UNESCO, Digital Learning and Accessibility in India: Policy Gap Analysis, New Delhi Office (2023).

Rajasthan State Council of Educational Research and Training, Inclusion Review Report (2022).

Radhika (2025). p. 77.

Rajendran et. al. (2025), p. 57.

Centre for Disability Studies, University of Delhi, Multi-Year Focus Group Discussion Report, 2015–2023.

Inclusive India Coalition, Community-Based Inclusion Practices: Evidence from Learning Centres, Evaluation Report (2023).

National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, Disability and Education Complaints Dashboard, Annual Summary (2023).

Id. at 16.

UDISE+, Annual Flash Statistics 2023, Ministry of Education, Government of India (2023).

National Deaf Children’s Society, Educational Outcomes and Access Data Report (2023).

NDCS, Gender and Disability Intersectional Analysis Report (2023).

Indian Sign Language Research and Training Centre (ISLRTC), Deaf Education Status Report, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (2023).

ASER Centre, Annual Status of Education Report – Inclusive Literacy Edition, Pratham (2023).

Department for Education (UK), Deaf Children’s Literacy Progress Report (2023).

UK Department for Education, GCSE Performance and Disability Overview, (2023).

Central Board of Secondary Education, Examination Results Analysis – Children with Disabilities, (2023).

National Council of Applied Economic Research, Disability and Economic Equity Report (2023).

UK Department for Education, Pupil Premium Evaluation – SEN Focus (2023).

Roy (2025), p. 2639.

DoE (UK), Assistive Technology in Education 2023 Report (2023)

Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (India), Accessible Digital Learning for Children with Disabilities, Annual Report (2023).

ISLRTC, Annual Progress Report 2023 (2023).

National Deaf Children's Society (UK), Digital Education Tools for Deaf Children (2023).

MoE (India), PM eVidya Initiative: Accessibility Audit Report (2023).

UK DoE, Budget Allocation for Inclusive Digital Reforms (2023).

Oak National Academy, Inclusion Impact Assessment (2022)

Kushalnagar et. al. (2024), p. 3-9.

ISLRTC, Indian Sign Language Dictionary Expansion Progress Report (2023).

NRCPD, Interpreter Registry and Performance Evaluation 2023 (2023).

National Association of the Deaf (India), Deaf Learner Experiences During COVID-19 Survey Report (2021).

UK Department for Education, Pandemic Impact Summary (2022).

Friedner (2025), p. 165.

V-Shesh Annual Report, Inclusive Skilling for the Deaf (2022).

United Nations, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Art. 9 (2006).

World Bank, Reimagining Inclusive Digital Learning Report (2023).