AI-Driven Anti-Money Laundering Systems and Compliance Costs in Malaysian Fintech Smes: the Roles of Operational Efficiency and Toe Readiness
Main Article Content
Abstract
Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance has become more technologically-intensive and costly, creating a difficult trade-off for small and medium-sized financial technology (FinTech) firms. This conceptual paper develops a framework explaining how AI-powered AML systems could reduce regulatory compliance costs for Malaysian FinTech SMEs and how these cost effects depend on operational and organisational conditions. Informed by AI-AML research, the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework, and the Resource-Based View (RBV), the article contends that artificial intelligence will not automatically reduce compliance expenditure. In contrast, operational efficiency can be enhanced through machine learning, natural language processing, and graph-based monitoring, which can help reduce unnecessary alert review, speed up investigation and reporting, and shift compliance capacity from low-risk to higher-risk cases. Thus, operational efficiency is identified as the primary mediating mechanism between AI-AML adoption and compliance costs. Technological preparedness, organisational preparedness, and environment-related pressures are theorised as boundary conditions that strengthen/weaken the value realised from adoption. Due to tightening AML obligations and Bank Negara Malaysia’s simultaneous advancement of policy agenda for responsible AI adoption in financial services, Malaysia is a timely setting. In the article, a parsimonious framework and testable propositions have been provided for empirical validation through PLS-SEM and explanatory interviews with Malaysian FinTech SMEs
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Baker, J. (2012). The technology-organization-environment framework. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. L. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory: Explaining and predicting our digital society (Vol. 1, pp. 231-245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2023, September 1). Bank Negara Malaysia imposes administrative monetary penalty on TNG Digital Sdn. Bhd. for non-compliances with the Financial Services Act 2013. https://www.bnm.gov.my/-/ea-pn-07-2023
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2024, February 5). Policy document on anti-money laundering, countering financing of terrorism, countering proliferation financing and targeted financial sanctions for financial institutions. https://www.bnm.gov.my/-/pd-amlcftcpftfs-fi
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2025, August 5). Discussion paper on artificial intelligence in the Malaysian financial sector. https://www.bnm.gov.my/innovation
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2026). The AMLA: Anti-money laundering / countering financing of terrorism (AML/CFT). https://amlcft.bnm.gov.my/the-amla
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
de Oliveira, J. R., & Leal, A. G. (2024). Enhancing anti-money laundering protocols: Employing machine learning to minimise false positives and improve operational cost efficiency. In Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence (ICAAI '24) (pp. 8-13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3704137.3704156
Financial Action Task Force. (2021). Opportunities and challenges of new technologies for AML/CFT. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Digitaltransformation/Opportunities-challenges-new-technologies-aml-cft.html
Financial Action Task Force, & Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering. (2025). Malaysia's measures to counter money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing: Mutual evaluation report. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/mer-malaysia-2025.html
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Halford, E., Gibson, I., Newfield, M., & Dhanwala, M. (2025). Developing a scoring model for managing money laundering transactions using machine learning. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 28(7), 30-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2024-0152
Han, J., Huang, Y., Liu, S., & Towey, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence for anti-money laundering: A review and extension. Digital Finance, 2(3-4), 211-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-020-00023-1
Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 82-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903439003
Jensen, R. I. T., & Iosifidis, A. (2023). Fighting money laundering with statistics and machine learning. IEEE Access, 11, 8889-8903. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3239549
Joshi Shushri Shalini Shree Gajanand, & Trivedi, A. (2026). Impact of artificial intelligence assisted HR practices on employee performance and profitability of public sector bank in India. CINEFORUM, 66(2), 923-937. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20434156
Khan, H. U., Malik, M. Z., & Nazir, S. (2024). Identifying the AI-based solutions proposed for restricting money laundering in financial sectors: Systematic mapping. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 38(1), 2344415. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2344415
OECD. (2014). OECD regulatory compliance cost assessment guidance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264209657-en
Rebekah, E., & Afjal, M. (2025). Exploring the mediating role of FinTech adoption and digital transformation in enhancing bank performance: A TOE framework study using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251367149
Reite, E. J., Karlsen, J., & Westgaard, E. G. (2025). Improving client risk classification with machine learning to increase anti-money laundering detection efficiency. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 28(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-03-2024-0040
Securities Commission Malaysia. (2024). Administrative actions in 2024: Tokenize Technology (M) Sdn Bhd. https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/enforcement/actions/administrative-actions/administrative-actions-in-2024
Sharma, N., & S, M. (2026). AI affordance and its influence on adoption intention of salesperson. CINEFORUM, 66(1), 567-596. https://revistadecineforum.com/index.php/cf/article/view/654
SME Corporation Malaysia. (n.d.). SME definition. https://smecorp.gov.my/index.php/en/policies/2020-02-11-08-01-24/sme-definition
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
Varma, A. (2019). Fintech adoption choices of small businesses: A technology organization environment (TOE) framework study. Accounting and Finance Research, 8(2), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v8n2p86