Degradation of Forensically Important Biological Fluids: A Comparative Study on Different Surfaces, Temperatures, and Time Intervals

Main Article Content

Neetu Sharma
Jaskaran Singh

Abstract

Biological fluids recovered from crime scenes are vulnerable to environmental and microbial degradation, which can reduce their forensic value before laboratory examination. Although previous studies have examined individual factors affecting biological evidence, limited experimental research has systematically investigated the combined influence of temperature, exposure duration, substrate characteristics, and microbial activity on the degradation of blood and saliva. This study addresses this gap by examining the microbial degradation of blood and saliva deposited on five commonly encountered substrates: soil, glass, wall, floor, and ceramic tile, under three temperature conditions (4–9°C, 20–25°C, and 40–45°C). Samples obtained from five healthy volunteers were examined at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours. Microbial growth and degradation were evaluated using conventional culture methods, staining techniques, selective media, and standard biochemical tests.


The findings indicated that temperature, exposure duration, and substrate characteristics substantially influenced microbial growth and biological-fluid degradation. Soil exhibited the greatest microbial diversity and degradation, whereas non-porous surfaces generally demonstrated comparatively limited microbial growth. Moderate temperature conditions (20–25°C) produced pronounced degradation, particularly between 12 and 24 hours. Reduced detectable amylase activity was associated with saliva degradation, while folate-dependent haemolytic Streptococcus species were identified among the major contributors to blood degradation. The study demonstrates that biological-fluid persistence is governed by the interaction of environmental and substrate-related factors. The findings address an important research gap and provide practical implications for the timely recovery, packaging, preservation, and forensic interpretation of biological evidence..

Article Details

How to Cite
Sharma, N., & Singh, J. (2026). Degradation of Forensically Important Biological Fluids: A Comparative Study on Different Surfaces, Temperatures, and Time Intervals. CINEFORUM, 66(S6), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.66669/cineforum.v66iS6.1628
Section
Original Articles

References

Aloraer, D. (2017). Evaluation of collection protocols for the recovery ofbiologicalsamples from crime scenes [University of Lancashire]. In CLOK (University of Central Lancashire).

Bagban, M., Parmar, N., & Jain, N. (2019). Extraction & purification of hemolysin from toxinproducingmicroorganismsanditseffecton forensically important blood and saliva samples. Bacterial Empire, 2(4), 76–76.

Bisker,C.,Taylor,G.,Carney,H.,&Ralebitso-Senior,T.K.(2021).ACombinedApplication of Molecular Microbial Ecology and ElementalAnalysesCanAdvancetheUnderstandingof Decomposition Dynamics. Liverpool John Moores University, 9.

Divya, K., GK, M., Umema, A., & SS, D. (2024). Environmental Factors Affecting the Concentration of DNA in Blood and Saliva Stains: A Review. Journal of Forensic Science and Research, 8(1), 9–15.

Elliott, C., Shafer, A. B. A.,&Stotesbury,T.(2022).Thecruxoftime:Ameta-analysisofex vivo whole blood degradation. Frontiers in Analytical Science, 2.

Gracia-de-Lucas, S., López-Matayoshi, C., Lozano-García, M., & Gomes, C. (2026). Unearthingforensic genetics: preliminary results on the ability to generate DNA profiles from buried human biological samples. International Journal of Legal Medicine.

Iancu, L., Bonicelli, A., & Procopio, N. (2024). Decomposition in an extreme cold environment and associated microbiome—prediction model implications for the postmortem interval estimation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 1392716–1392716.

Joseph, É. (2021). Microorganisms in the Deterioration and Preservation of Cultural Heritage.

Lim, D. V., Simpson, J. M., Kearns, E. A., & Kramer, M.F.(2005).CurrentandDeveloping Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 18(4), 583–607.

Nasir, A. M., Kamal, N. H. N. M., & Hamzah, N. H. (2026). Forensic Reliability of Body Fluids in Sexual Assault Investigations: A Systematic Review. Analytica—A Journal of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical Analysis, 7(1), 21–21.

Ogdur, M., Çakan, H., & Çevik, F. E. (2018). Investigation of the microorganisms decaying bloody evidences. Medicine Science | International Medical Journal, 1–1.

Pajnič, I. Z. (2025). Analysis ofHumanDegradedDNAinForensicGenetics.Genes,16(11), 1375–1375.

Rankin-Turner, S., Turner, M. A., Kelly, P. F., King, R. S. P., & Reynolds, J. C. (2018). Transforming presumptive forensictesting:insituidentificationandageestimationofhuman bodily fluids. Chemical Science, 10(4), 1064–1069.

Salzmann, A. P., Russo, G., Kreutzer, S., & Haas, C. (2021). Degradation of human mRNA transcripts over time as an indicator of the time since deposition (TsD) in biological crime scene traces. Forensic Science International Genetics, 53, 102524–102524.

Song, Y., Huang, Y.-Y., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Ferrari, M., & Qin, L. (2014). Point-of-care technologies for molecular diagnosticsusingadropofblood.TrendsinBiotechnology,32(3), 132–139.

Swayambhu, M., Kümmerli, R., & Arora, N. (2023). Microbiome-Based Stain Analyses in Crime Scenes. PubMed Central, 89(1).

Upadhyay, M., Shrivastava, P., Verma, K., & Joshi, B. C. (2023). Recent advancements in identification and detection of saliva as forensic evidence: a review. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 13(1).

Verdier, T., Coutand, M., Bertron, A., & Roques, C. (2014). A review of indoor microbial growth across building materials and sampling and analysis methods. Building and Environment, 80, 136–149.

Wahab, A. M. A., Menon, S., & Jacob, A. A. (2025). Evaluation of Microbial Growth in Dried Blood Stains. 3750–3753.

Zapata, F., Ossa, M. Á. F. de la, & García-Ruiz, C. (2014). Emerging spectrometric techniques for the forensic analysis of body fluids. e_Buah, 64,