The Faculty Paradox: Assessing Digital Fatigue and Institutional Readiness for AI Integration in Higher Education

Main Article Content

Harshini C S
P. Mary Celine Rose
Showmiya SHA
Ch. V. Mahalakshmi
Smriti Pareek
S. Sumathi

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of AI tools into Indian higher education institutions (HEIs) has been faster than the faculty members' psychological and institutional capability to cope with them. This paper addresses the 'faculty paradox', which is the challenge of teaching faculty facing increasing digital fatigue and technostress as well as institutional pressure to adopt AI and studies the relationship between these factors and faculty AI adoption intention and behaviour. A cross-sectional, positivist survey design was adopted. A structured questionnaire based on adapted items from the Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale, Techno-Stress Construct for Higher Education and Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) institutional readiness scale was filled out to faculty in central, state, private and deemed-to-be universities in India. The analysis include confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the measurement model and structural path estimate. Digital fatigue and technostress had a major negative impact on institutional readiness and AI adoption intentions, while institutional readiness positively predicted adoption intention, which in turn led to actual AI integration behaviour. Institutional readiness partially mediated the fatigue-adoption relationship and perceived organizational support calmed down the negative impact of digital fatigue on readiness. This paper is the first to incorporate digital fatigue and technostress theory into the TOE framework in one SEM model of Indian faculty AI adoption, giving evidence-based levers, workload redesign, tiered digital training and organizational support and policy interventions to HEI leaders and policy makers to implement India's National Education Policy 2020 and National AI strategy

Article Details

How to Cite
C S , H., Celine Rose , P. M., SHA, S., Mahalakshmi, C. V., Pareek, S., & Sumathi, S. (2026). The Faculty Paradox: Assessing Digital Fatigue and Institutional Readiness for AI Integration in Higher Education. CINEFORUM, 66(S6), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.66669/cineforum.v66iS6.1515
Section
Original Articles

References

Azevedo, A. (2025). Institutional policies on artificial intelligence in higher education: Frameworks and best practices for faculty. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2025.

Boyer-Davis, S. (2020). Technostress in higher education: An examination of faculty perceptions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.

AICTE. (2024). AICTE initiatives on Artificial Intelligence. All India Council for Technical Education.

Digital Education Council. (2025). DEC Global AI Faculty Survey 2025. Digital Education Council.

Cao, S., Ali, S., Yawar, R. B., Saif, N., Goh, G. G. G., Khan, F., & Hussain, M. (2025). Constructing and validating a scale for technostress and employee behavior: Evidence from business schools in a developing country. BMC Psychology, 13, Article 812. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03152-7

S. Sharma, G. Muydinova, B. Charwak and P. Nagpal, "IT-Enabled Management Frameworks for Driving Sustainable Social Change," 2026 IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI), Gwalior, India, 2026, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/IATMSI68868.2026.11465880.

Digital Education Council. (2024). DEC Global AI Student Survey 2024. Digital Education Council.

Nagpal, P., Nalina, K. B., & Adarsh, A. (2026). Antecedents influencing employee engagement in knowledge-driven organizations. In S. Koppa, R. Shah, & M. Appadoo (Eds.), Empowering inclusive innovation (pp. 268–274). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003753445-30

Digital Education Council. (2025). Ten-dimension AI readiness framework. Digital Education Council.

EDUCAUSE. (2025). 2025 AI landscape study: Into the digital AI divide. EDUCAUSE.

EY-India & FICCI. (2025). Harnessing AI in higher education: Opportunities and the road ahead. Ernst & Young LLP (India) / Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

Fauville, G., Luo, M., Queiroz, A. C. M., Bailenson, J. N., & Hancock, J. (2021). Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100119

Segon, S. (2025). Tracking India's AI push. Research Information.

P. Nagpal, "The Role of ICT and Algorithmic Systems in Shaping Gig Worker Evaluations and Retention," 2025 IEEE 5th International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India, India, 2025, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICTBIG68706.2025.11323582.

Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Madhusudhan R. Urs & Pooja Nagpal (2019). A study on Determinants and Outcomes of Job Crafting in an Organization; Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 7, (15). 145-151. ISSN: 2349-5162

Nagpal, P. (2026). Burnout among gig workers triggered by customer ratings and algorithmic management. Journal of International Management and Technology, 2(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.65033/jimt.v2i1.009

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Rajput, N., Das, G., Kumar, C., & Nagpal, P. (2021). An inclusive systematic investigation of human resource management practice in harnessing human capital. Materials Today: Proceedings, 80(3), 3686–3690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.362

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

Jan, A., Cramer, T., & Li, X. (2024). Readiness for AI integration in higher education institutions: Drivers and barriers. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 5113–5136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-11832-5

Pooja Nagpal (2022) Online Business Issues and Strategies to overcome it- Indian Perspective. SJCC Management Research Review. Vol 12 (1) pp 1-10. June 2022, Print ISSN 2249-4359. DOI: 10.35737/sjccmrr/v12/il/2022/151

Marrinhas, D., Santos, V., Salvado, C., Pedrosa, D., & Pereira, A. (2023). Burnout and technostress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The perception of higher education teachers and researchers. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1144220.

Nascimento, L., Correia, M. F., & Califf, C. B. (2024). Towards a bright side of technostress in higher education teachers: Identifying several antecedents and outcomes of techno-eustress. Technology in Society, 76, 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102428

Pooja Nagpal, (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning for gaining competitive advantage in business development. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3327(1), 020002. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0289438

P. Nagpal, "The Role of ICT and Algorithmic Systems in Shaping Gig Worker Evaluations and Retention," 2025 IEEE 5th International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India, India, 2025, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICTBIG68706.2025.11323582.

BK Kumari, VM Sundari, C Praseeda, P Nagpal, J EP, S Awasthi (2023), Analytics-Based Performance Influential Factors Prediction for Sustainable Growth of Organization, Employee Psychological Engagement, Work Satisfaction, Training and Development. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities 6 (8s), 76-82.

P. Nagpal, A. Pawar and S. H. M, "Predicting Employee Attrition through HR Analytics: A Machine Learning Approach," 2024 4th International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM), Noida, India, 2024, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ICIPTM59628.2024.10563285.

Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. (2024). AI Index Report 2024. Stanford University.

Vaniya, J., Alizada, M., Nagpal, P., Kumar Dey, B. and Abbbasova, D. G. A. (2025). Novel Enhanced Cognitive State Analysis in E-Learning via Real-Time Emotion and Attentiveness Detection Using OptFuzzy TSM and ABiLSTM. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 57-75. doi: 10.22111/ijfs.2025.49950.8829

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Shrivastava, A., Suji Prasad, S. J., Yeruva, A. R., Mani, P., Nagpal, P., & Chaturvedi, A. (2025). IoT based RFID attendance monitoring system of students using Arduino ESP8266 & Adafruit.io on defined area. Cybernetics and Systems, 56(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2023.2166243.

Wang, Q., & Yao, N. (2025). Understanding the impact of technology usage at work on academics' psychological well-being: A perspective of technostress. BMC Psychology, 13, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02461-1

Wang, X., & Li, B. (2019). Technostress among university teachers in higher education: A study using multidimensional person-environment misfit theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01791