Relevance of Rules of Engagement in Non-International Armed Conflict: A Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Concept of Rules of Engagement has its roots in the laws and customs of war that have evolved over centuries. While the specific term ‘Rules of Engagement’ (ROE) may be relatively modern, the underlying principles have historical and legal origins. The law of armed conflict developed into its present content over millennia. To trace out the origin, broadly two categories may be understood which dealt with the early concept of ROE- Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. Jus ad Bellum refers to the conditions under which states may resort to war or to the use of armed forces in general . Law became a factor early in the historical development of warfare. The earliest references to rules regarding war referred to the conditions that justified resort to war both legally and morally. The examples which showcase this concept could be found amongst the ancient Egyptians and Sumerians (25th century B.C.) who generated rules and defining the circumstances under which war might be initiated . Even the ancient Hittites (16th century B.C.) required a formal exchange of letters and demands before initiating war. In addition, no war could begin during the planetarium season . Even the Romans formalized laws and procedures that made the use of force an act of last resort. Rome dispatched envoys to the States against whom they had grievances and attempted to resolve differences diplomatically. The Romans also are credited with developing the requirement for declaring war . Cicero wrote that war must be declared to be just . Jus in Bello on the other hand regulates the conduct of parties engaged in an armed conflict . It is body of law which deals with rules that control conduct during the prosecution of a war to ensure that it is legal and moral. Historically, Ancient Babylonians (7th century B.C.) treated both captured soldiers and civilians with respect in accordance with well-established rules .
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
International Committee of the Red Cross publication, International Humanitarian Law: answers to your questions (Jan 10 2023, 9:10 AM) https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-are-jus-ad-bellum-and-jus-bello0%EF%BB%BF.
th Edition of Law of Armed Conflict Deskbook, International and Operational Law Department, The US Army JAG’s Legal Center and School Charlottesville, VA.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Thornton Lockwood, Cicero’s Philosophy of Just War, last revised on Jul 28, 2022.
International Committee of the Red Cross, Supra Note 4.
International and Operational Law Department, Supra Note 5.
UK Parliament, Magna Carta (Jan 04 2024, 7:30 PM) https://www.parliament.uk/about/livingheritage/evolution/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/ overview/magnacarta.
United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations Guidelines, Use of Force by Military Components in Peacekeeping Operations, Jan 2017.
Article 28 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Article 25 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
International Committee of the Red Cross, Chapter 6, The Law of Armed Conflict - Command Responsibility (Jan 11, 2024 10:50 PM) https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/law6_final.pdf.
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, Rules of Engagement: Protecting Civilians through dialogue with Armed Non-State Actors, October 2011.
United Nations Security Council Resolutions (Jan 10, 2024, 1:45 PM) https://www/un.org/securitycouncil/content/resolutions-0.
Children and Armed Conflict, United Nations (Aug 11, 2024, 11:45 AM) https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/six-grave-violations/child-soldiers/.
Id.
Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, United Nations (Aug 11, 2024, 1205 PM) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child.
Article 38
States Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for rules of international humanitarian law applicable to them in armed conflicts which are relevant to the child.
States Parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure that persons who have not attained the age of fifteen years do not take a direct part in hostilities.
States Parties shall refrain from recruiting any person who has not attained the age of fifteen years into their armed forces. In recruiting among those persons who have attained the age of fifteen years but who have not attained the age of eighteen years, States Parties shall endeavour to give priority to those who are oldest.
In accordance with their obligations under international humanitarian law to protect the civilian population in armed conflicts, States Parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure protection and care of children who are affected by an armed conflict.
Optional Protocol to the CRC on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (OPAC) 2000, United Nations (Aug 11, 2024, 12:30 PM) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/optional-protocol-convention-rights-child-involvement-children
International Law, United Nations (Aug 11, 2024, 12:40 PM) https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/virtual-library/international-law/#:~:text=For%20example%3A%20the%20Rome%20Statute,and%20a%20crime%20against%20humanity.
JFR Boddens Hosang, Rules on the Use of Force as Linchpin for the International Law of Military Operations (2017)
Ibid.
International Humanitarian Law Databases, ICRC (Aug 11, 2024, 13:05 PM) https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949.
Medecins Sans Frontieres, The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 (Aug 11, 2024, 13:25 PM) https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/article/3/the-hague-conventions-of-1899-and-1907/.
ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Tadić, Appeals Chamber, Jurisdiction, ICRC (Aug 11, 2024, 13:45 PM) https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/icty-prosecutor-v-tadic/
ICJ, Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, Jun 27, 1986/
ICRC, United States, United States v. William L. Calley, Jr. (Aug 11, 2024, 14:05) https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/united-states-united-states-v-william-l-calley-jr.
Eugène Bakama Bope, The ICC and Reconciliation in the DRC (2015).
Medecins Sans Frontieres, International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR) and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals IRMCT) (Aug 11, 2024, 14:25 PM) https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/article/3/international-criminal-tribunals-for-the-former-yugoslavia-icty-and-rwanda-ictr-and-the-international-residual-mechanism-for-criminal-tribunals-irmct/.
UNHRC, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, Dec 15, 2005.
US Army JAG, Solatia Payments (Aug 11, 2024, 15:15 PM) https://myjag.com/otw/solatia-payments.
UNHRC, note 31 supra.
Office of the Historian, The Dawes Plan, the Young Plan, German Reparations, and Inter-allied War Debts (Aug 11, 2024, 16:05 PM) https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/dawes.
Uniform Code of Military Justice, Military Rules of Engagement: A Comprehensive Guide (Aug 11, 2024, 17:55PM)https://ucmj.us/military-rules-of-engagement/#:~:text=RoE%20becomes%20more%
open%20in,of%20War%20and%20global%20norms.
Sir William Gage, The Baha Mousa Public Inquiry Report, Sep 8, 2011.
Ministry of Defence, United Kingdom Manual of National Rules of Engagement (JSP 398) Part II.
Bundeswehr Defence, Defence Watcher (Aug 11, 2024, 18:15 PM) https://www.dw.com/en/new-rules-of-engagement-for-german-troops-in-afghanistan/a-4519627.