Reclaiming Strategic Subjectivity: Theorising India's Grand Strategic Doctrine under the Modi Order.

Main Article Content

Prashant Barthwal
Himani Pandey

Abstract

The role India plays in international politics in the twenty-first century calls for an assessment of the theoretical premises underpinning the country's emerging strategic posture. This research attempts precisely this – theorising about India's strategic doctrine under Prime Minister Narendra Modi (2014 to present), a tenure defined by unparalleled assertiveness, the revision of India's civilizational self-perception, and the strategic use of multi-alignment as a tool of statecraft. Using a three-dimensional theoretical framework including structural realism, constructivism, and postcolonial IR, the article concludes that none of the theories satisfactorily explains the epistemological complexity of the 'Modi Order' in Indian foreign and strategic policy. Rather, what is seen here is a unique doctrine that draws on both material considerations and civilizational aspirations, born of India's Hindu nationalist Weltanschauung and a desire to reclaim its place in the world within a liberal international order dominated by the West. The paper critically examines four core tenets of this new doctrine as follows: (i) the shift from Non-Alignment to strategic autonomy and multi-alignment; (ii) the recalibration of nuclear deterrence strategy and its effects on strategic stability in South Asia; (iii) the intensification of India's focus on the Indo-Pacific via Quad and maritime strategies; and (iv) the inclusion of civilisational identity, which is achieved through cultural diplomacy and the Jaishankar Doctrine, into the very fabric of India's grand strategic thinking. The article argues that the Modi Order is not a radical break from the legacy of Nehru, but neither a direct continuation nor a complex and conflictual compromise between the two that mirrors the inherent tensions of a state trying to become both a great power and a revisionist state within the frameworks of multilateral institutions. The inference has important theoretical implications for the discussion about rising states, regional hegemons, and the sustainability of the liberal international order in an age of pronounced multipolarity...

Article Details

How to Cite
Barthwal, P., & Pandey, H. (2026). Reclaiming Strategic Subjectivity: Theorising India’s Grand Strategic Doctrine under the Modi Order. CINEFORUM, 66(S3), 120–127. Retrieved from https://revistadecineforum.com/index.php/cf/article/view/1234
Section
Original Articles

References

Acharya, A. (2014). The end of the American world order. Polity Press.

Acharya, A. (2018). Constructing global order: Agency and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.

Bajpai, K., Ganguly, S., & Pant, H. V. (Eds.). (2019). Routledge handbook of Indian foreign policy. Routledge.

Basrur, R. (2017). Modi's foreign policy fundamentals: A trajectory unchanged. International Affairs, 93(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw009

Chatterjee Miller, M., & Sullivan de Estrada, K. (2017). Pragmatism in Indian foreign policy: How ideas constrain Modi. International Affairs, 93(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw011

Ciorciari, J. D., & Haacke, J. (2019). Hedging in international relations: An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz021

Ehtisham, H. (2022). The diminishing credibility of the Indian "No First Use" policy. Strategic Vision Institute Policy Brief, 8(1), 25–48.

Estrada, K. S. (2023). India and order transition in the Indo-Pacific: Resisting the Quad as a security community. The Pacific Review, 36(2), 378–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1986451

Hall, I. (2019). Modi and the reinvention of Indian foreign policy. Bristol University Press.

Hall, I., & Ganguly, S. (2022). Introduction: Narendra Modi and India's foreign policy. International Politics, 59(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00363-8

Huju, K. (2022). Saffronizing diplomacy: The Indian Foreign Service under Hindu nationalist rule. International Affairs, 98(2), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac005

Jaffrelot, C. (2021). Modi's India: Hindu nationalism and the rise of ethnic democracy. Princeton University Press.

Jaishankar, S. (2020). The Indian Way: Strategies for an Uncertain World. HarperCollins India.

Jaishankar, S. (2024). Why Bharat matters. Rupa Publications.

Jamali, M. A., Hassan, S., & Qambrani, N. (2024). India in contested regional multilateralism: Between seeking institutional balancing and avoiding rising power dilemmas. Pacific Focus, 39(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12256

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton.

Menon, S. (2016). Choices: Inside the making of India's foreign policy. Penguin Books India.

Miller, M. C. (2013). India's feeble foreign policy: A would-be great power resists its own rise. Foreign Affairs, 92(3), 14–19.

Mishra, R. (2023). From non-alignment to multi-alignment: Assessing India's foreign policy shift. The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 112(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2022.2163271

Rajagopalan, R. (2020). Evasive balancing: India's unviable Indo-Pacific strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz224

Rajagopalan, R., & Mishra, A. (2014). Nuclear South Asia: Keywords and concepts. Routledge.

Seth, S. (2013). Postcolonial theory and international relations: A critical introduction. Routledge.

Shilliam, R. (Ed.). (2011). International relations and non-Western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. Routledge.

Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001179

SIPRI. (2024). SIPRI military expenditure database 2024. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex

Tellis, A. J. (2016). India is a leading power—Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Vinodan, C., & Kurian, A. L. (2024). Strategic autonomy and India's hedging policies in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 11(4), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970241282095

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press..